Sunday, September 11, 2011

Imperial Adam- A.D. Hope REVISED

The poem "Imperial Adam" by A.D. Hope describes the trials of Adam and presumably Eve; the creation of a woman, the impregnation of a woman,  and the  birth of a human are depicted in a rather cacophemistic tone. Throughout this poem, it is interesting to note how God displays himself as an incontrovertibly omnipotent force. The line, "The surgeon fingers probing at the bone," describes how God is controlling and is parallel to the concept that surgeons place their patients in a powerless or unconscious state, thereby being able to exert their complete will upon them with no objection. Similarly,  God also appears to know the single and only correct perspective for anything. When one views Adam and the woman as his children, he appears to have a patronizing and dominative tone; the line, "It is not good for him to live alone," suggests that God knows what is best for his children, and they should close their mouths in obedience. The narrative perspective is perhaps the most resonating factor in proving God's Creator complex. The entire poem centers around the trials of Adam and his companion. Adam , "found the breed of men," the woman, " broke her terrible and triumphant female cry," and eventually, "the first murderer lay upon the earth." The narrator, God, speaks of the events going on in a third person perspective, watching his actions come undone; it is as if He is watching His ants quiver once he pokes them with His hands. God struggling to prove his force is apparent throughout the poem, and A.D. Hope provides several more examples.

1 comment:

  1. David you do prove an interesting point of how God forces his will upon the people, leaving them powerless to make any objection which can show God as either a good force or a bad force depending on how he implemented his will. In some cases you hear of those miracles where God supposedly spared the lives of a person or whatnot, I say supposedly because it is mere speculation based solely on one’s faith in God. Then there are those cases where someone dies of a freak accident and people curse God, asking him why he did what he did. In both cases however neither person had a hand in God’s “will”, it just happened. What I am trying to say here is that that one sentence can paint God in many different ways depending on how people see it, but in the end he is all powerful and no one can really argue against his “will.”

    Also I do want to say that you paint surgeons in interesting way, kind of calling them God because they hold the life of the patient in their hands, which I find to be correct to a certain extent. However as humans we created a list of rules and regulations that the surgeons abide by and they cannot really work outside of that range of rules. For example, a surgeon cannot perform a surgery without written consent even if the person is unconscious. If in the case the person is unconscious then the closest living relative must give consent before the operation can go underway. I just wanted to make that distinction.

    ReplyDelete